The second sentence in the last paragraph should have read: "So even if its test results are negative a patient..."
On page 390 of the article "Lecture Link: The emergence of a 'new' parvovirus" in the September 2012 issue, the second sentence in the last paragraph should have read: "So even if its test results are negative, a patient strongly suspected of having parvovirus infection (based on signalment and clinical signs) could still have the infection and should be treated appropriately."
We regret any confusion this error may have caused.
UN, WHO address public health concern over avian flu transmission to humans
April 18th 2024Veterinary professionals working with certain animals are advised to take precautionary steps to minimize risk of infection, while researchers in Texas study potential H5N1 vaccines, antivirals, and antibody therapies for humans
Read More