- One Health
- Pain Management
- Oncology
- Geriatric & Palliative Medicine
- Ophthalmology
- Anatomic Pathology
- Poultry Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Dermatology
- Theriogenology
- Nutrition
- Animal Welfare
- Radiology
- Internal Medicine
- Small Ruminant
- Cardiology
- Dentistry
- Feline Medicine
- Soft Tissue Surgery
- Urology/Nephrology
- Avian & Exotic
- Preventive Medicine
- Anesthesiology & Pain Management
- Integrative & Holistic Medicine
- Food Animals
- Behavior
- Zoo Medicine
- Toxicology
- Orthopedics
- Emergency & Critical Care
- Equine Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Pediatrics
- Respiratory Medicine
- Shelter Medicine
- Parasitology
- Clinical Pathology
- Virtual Care
- Rehabilitation
- Epidemiology
- Fish Medicine
- Diabetes
- Livestock
- Endocrinology
The last straw: Evaluating bovine sex-sorting technology
These findings display the effects of bovine sperm sex-sorting, plus how farmers can achieve optimal reproductive success.
Farmers have the ability to select the sex of the calves they breed with the use of sex-sorting technology. This ever-evolving technology has been around for the past few decades and field study reports have found conflicting reproductive outcomes.1
Researchers from Germany analyzed 72 trials to determine the overall effects of sex-sorting of bovine sperm on non-return rates 24-or 60-day (NRR 24/60), pregnancy, calving, abortion, and stillbirth rates. The article “The reproductive success of bovine sperm after sex-sorting: a meta-analysis,”1 also describes how farmers can achieve optimal reproductive success.
The non-return rate, or the number of inseminated cows that did not need repeat insemination within a certain amount of time, declined by 13% after using sex-sorted sperm.1 Farmers may have failed to identify unsuccessful insemination or failed to re-inseminate the cow with sex-sorted sperm.
The researchers identified an almost 25% reduction in pregnancy and calving rates after sex-sorting.1 This decrease was likely due to the stress on the sperm when it goes through sorting. Sorting subjects sperm to multiple stressors such as high pressures to go through the flow cytometer, exposure to UV laser light, and cooling to 5 °C.1 These temperatures, mechanical, and chemical stressors lead to deformations of the spermatozoa head, sharp bends in the tail, and an increased number of damaged mitochondria. Sperm-sorting’s freeze/thaw process likely exacerbates these changes and has been found to reduce the pregnancy rate ratio compared to fresh sex-sorted sperm.1 Fresh sex-sorted sperm do not undergo the freeze/thaw process and are less likely to have these deformities. Very few trials evaluated the use of fresh sex-sorted sperm and more studies are needed to determine its benefit.
Abortion and stillbirth rates were not dramatically affected using sex-sorted sperm. Stillbirths are more likely to occur in offspring that have been sexed for the wrong sex.1 For example, a male cow born despite X-sexed semen being given to the mother would be more likely to result in stillbirth.
Farmers and insemination stations may achieve optimal reproductive success by increasing the amount of sperm in an insemination straw from 2.5 million to 4 million, using sex-sorting technology, and giving this sperm only to female cows that have not yet birthed a calf (heifers).1 More studies are needed so that farmers can maximize the use of sex-sorted sperm. Improvements in sex-sorting technology are also necessary to aid in the farmers' and insemination stations’ economic prosperity.
Reference
- Reese S, Pirez MC, Steele H, Kölle S. The reproductive success of bovine sperm after sex-sorting: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):17366. Published Aug 30, 2021. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96834-2
Bean is a 2022 PharmD Candidate at the University of Connecticut.
