• Vetiranary Medicine
  • ACVCACVC
  • DVM 360
  • Fetch DVM 360Fetch DVM 360
DVM 360
dvm360 | Veterinary News, Veterinarian Insights, Medicine, Pet Care
dvm360 | Veterinary News, Veterinarian Insights, Medicine, Pet Care
By Role
AssociatesOwnersPractice ManagerStudentsTechnicians
Subscriptions
dvm360 Newsletterdvm360 Magazine
News
All News
Association
Breaking News
Conference Coverage
Education
Equine
FDA
Law & Ethics
Market Trends
Medical
Politics
Products
Recalls
Regulatory
Digital Media
dvm360 LIVE!™
Expert Interviews
The Vet Blast Podcast
Medical World News
Pet Connections
The Dilemma Live
Vet Perspectives™
Weekly Newscast
dvm360 Insights™
Publications
All Publications
dvm360
Firstline
Supplements
Top Recommended Veterinary Products
Vetted
Clinical
All Clinical
Anesthesia
Animal Welfare
Behavior
Cardiology
CBD in Pets
Dentistry
Dermatology
Diabetes
Emergency & Critical Care
Endocrinology
Equine Medicine
Exotic Animal Medicine
Feline Medicine
Gastroenterology
Imaging
Infectious Diseases
Integrative Medicine
Nutrition
Oncology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedics
Pain Management
Parasitology
Pharmacy
Surgery
Toxicology
Urology & Nephrology
Virtual Care
Business
All Business
Business & Personal Finance
Hospital Design
Personnel Management
Practice Finances
Practice Operations
Wellbeing & Lifestyle
Continuing Education
Conferences
Conference Listing
Conference Proceedings
Resources
CBD in Pets
CE Requirements by State
Contests
Veterinary Heroes
Partners
Spotlight Series
Team Meeting in a Box
Toolkit
Top Recommended Veterinary Products
Vet to Vet
  • Contact Us
  • Fetch DVM360 Conference
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Do Not Sell My Information
  • About Us

© 2023 MJH Life Sciences and dvm360 | Veterinary News, Veterinarian Insights, Medicine, Pet Care. All rights reserved.

Advertisement
By Role
  • Associates
  • Owners
  • Practice Manager
  • Students
  • Technicians
Subscriptions
  • dvm360 Newsletter
  • dvm360 Magazine
  • Contact Us
  • Fetch DVM360 Conference
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Do Not Sell My Information
  • About Us
  • MJHLS Brand Logo

© 2023 MJH Life Sciences™ and dvm360 | Veterinary News, Veterinarian Insights, Medicine, Pet Care. All rights reserved.

Digital dental radiography: Using the modality to enhance patient care

January 1, 2009
Brett Beckman, DVM, FAVD, DAVDC, DAAPM

Dental radiology is the cornerstone of quality veterinary dentistry.

Dental radiology is the cornerstone of quality veterinary dentistry. It is impossible to provide quality veterinary dental care in lieu of this invaluable diagnostic modality. Treatment decisions rely on the visualization of subgingival pathology that only radiology can feasibly provide. Digital dental radiology has proven to be a reliable and affordable choice for veterinary practices that are committed to practicing quality veterinary dentistry. The following discussion is a continuation of a series of articles on radiography and will provide an overview of choices concerning this exciting diagnostic tool.

Direct digital radiography

Direct digital radiology uses a digital sensor instead of film to capture the images. Standard radiography units (generators), discussed in a prior article in this series, come wall-mounted, as mobile floor models or most recently hand-held. When these units are activated to take an image using a digital sensor, the photons generated create a flow of electrons within the digital sensor. The image is simultaneously transferred to the computer either by a USB cable or most recently wirelessly using Bluetooth technology. The computer then processes the gray-scale data, arranging pixels based on the photon passage through the various oral-cavity tissue densities to create the image. This entire process takes only seconds to complete before the image appears on the computer screen.

Advertisement

Indirect digital radiography

Indirect digital radiology uses photon energy emitted from the generator to emit light from a phosphor plate rather than a digital sensor. The plate is then placed in a scanner. The light emitted is scanned by a laser and transmitted to the computer software for image generation using the gray-scale data one pixel at a time as described with direct digital radiography.

Direct vs. indirect comparison

Resolution varies among systems, however image quality is reliably constant and diagnostic images are easily obtainable with any digital system.

Speed is a tremendous advantage for direct digital over both film and indirect digital dental radiology. Images are generally present on screen in less than 6 seconds with this modality. Processing times vary with indirect digital depending on the resolution desired, however times are similar to hand developing.

Sensor size is a big advantage of indirect digital systems. A size 4 indirect phosphor plate is noticeably larger that the size 2 sensor limitation of direct digital. This makes image capture easier (due to a larger target) and quicker in that a larger area can be imaged decreasing the number of images required. Size 4 sensors are particularly convenient when taking a full-mouth series on a large dog or when screening for nasal pathology.

Exposure time

Digital decreases exposure requirements. Depending on the sensor, dramatic reduction techniques can be accomplished. Archiving is a tremendous advantage of digital, too. Although individual digital pictures can be taken of radiographs acquired using film, this practice is time-consuming, and archiving within practice-management software remains a manual process. Because of the speed direct digital provides, the image can be viewed within seconds on the screen and adjustments can be made to the tube head with the film still in place if the positioning is incorrect.

When taking a full-mouth series with indirect digital and film, it is customary to expose the entire series of images. Excessive anesthetic time precludes development of each individual film or phosphor plate before moving on to the next image. Damage to film carries little cost concern, but damage to a digital sensor may result in a very expensive replacement. Warranties generally do not cover trauma to the sensor. Keep in mind that allowing a patient to bite the sensor could cost thousands of dollars for a replacement. Phosphor plates also can be damaged, but replacement costs are minimal by comparison ($25-$90).

Finally, images may be manipulated within the software to enhance visualization of structures. Adjustments may be made to brightness and contrast, minimizing retakes. Images may be colorized, visualized in 3D, optimized and measured. These manipulations only can be done effectively with digital images.

Each individual should evaluate multiple systems to compare cost, ease of use, compatibility with practice-management software and technical-support options. Use of digital technology will afford today's progressive practitioner the diagnostic modality needed to practice quality veterinary dentistry, greatly enhancing patient care.

Brett Beckman, DVM, FAVD, Dipl. AVDC practices referral dentistry at Affiliated Veterinary Specialists, Orlando, Fla.; Noah's Animal Hospitals in Indianapolis; and at Florida Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery in Punta Gorda, Fla. He is president-elect of the American Veterinary Dental Society and diplomate of the American Academy of Pain Management.

Related Content:

ImagingDentistry
Dental hacks to make every case more manageable
Dental hacks to make every case more manageable
Q&A with a keynote: Jan Bellows, DVM, DAVDC, DABVP, FAVD
Q&A with a keynote: Jan Bellows, DVM, DAVDC, DABVP, FAVD
Targeting care for senior cats and their caretakers
Targeting care for senior cats and their caretakers

Advertisement

Latest News

Managing wounds in pet patients

Spectrum of care: protocols to support pet owners’ budgets

How to support women while still running a successful business

The Vets expands to Raleigh, NC

View More Latest News
Advertisement